CEF Symposium Keynote Address
CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION SYMPOSIUM
Friday, March 23, 2007
Reverend Kris D. Stubna, S.T.D.
Secretary for Education, Diocese of Pittsburgh
Today Catholic elementary and secondary schools in the United States serve nearly 2.5 million students. However, the peak was reached in the mid 1960‘s when nearly 5.5 million students were enrolled. Since 1990 more than 400 new Catholic schools have opened in the United States, but during that same period there has been a net loss of more than 760 Catholic schools. Unfortunately, most of that decline has been concentrated in urban, inner city and rural areas. Both the accessibility of Catholic education and its affordability, especially for the poor, have been compromised.
Concurrently, Catholic education has experienced a radical shift from a religious to a lay leadership and staff. In 1965 there were 180,000 religious sisters in the United States; today there are fewer than 75,000, of whom more than 50 percent are over seventy years of age. In 2005, religious women constituted less than 4 percent of the full-time professional staff of Catholic schools, while 95 percent of teachers are lay persons.
This represents a particular challenge for Catholic education that touches upon its very identity. For decades the leadership and presence of a vastly religious staff served as a “built-in” guarantee for the school’s Catholic identity. This was assumed and taken for granted. The shift to an almost entirely lay apostolate requires an ecclesial response of some urgency. To be effective bearers of the Church’s educational tradition, lay persons need a religious formation that is equal to their cultural and professional formation. This a special challenge because of the highly secular nature of the culture in which we live.
In their recent pastoral statement, Renewing Our Commitment to Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools in the Third Millennium, the United States bishops make it clear that Catholic schools afford the fullest and best opportunity to realize the fourfold purpose of Christian education, “namely, to provide an atmosphere in which the Gospel message is proclaimed, community in Christ is experienced, service to our sisters and brothers is the norm, and thanksgiving and worship of God is cultivated.” They say quite boldly that the vitality of the Church is inextricably linked to the health and success of its Catholic schools because the schools provide the most effective way to form holy men and women who make God known, loved and served.
I was reading some material on Catholic schools in our diocesan archives and found a beautiful description of Catholic schools in the Pittsburgh Catholic, America’s oldest Catholic Newspaper in continuous publication. “Education trains the child, and that training must be complete. Education must train the heart and soul, the will and conscience, as well as enlighten the mind and strengthen the body. The training of the conscience of the child must be part and parcel of his education, and not an adjunct applied by some casual, external source. For the sake of the child, and because it is his constitutional right, the Catholic American citizen maintains the parish school system. No slighting or curtailing of the intellectual and physical training of the child is considered or tolerated. The child must grow strong in body and cultured in mind and must be prepared to meet the conditions of his life, but he must also be trained in the things that appertain to his soul, his will, his conscience. This is an essential part of the education of the child. To supply so essential a training, the parish school system is erected and maintained at a great sacrifice on the part of the American Catholic citizen. By so doing, he performs a sacred duty and renders a meritorious service to the State. The school is the home of the virtuous citizen. He who molds the character of the child makes the history of the future.” This was written in 1921!
I read, as well, the keynote address given in April 1961 by Bishop John J. Wright, then Bishop of Pittsburgh, to the NCEA convention being held in Atlantic City. In speaking to the distinctive qualities of Catholic schools, he said this: “We need men whose intellectual view embraces the history of the race, who are familiar with all literature, who have studied all social movements, who are acquainted with the development of the philosophical thought, who are not blinded by physical miracles, and industrial wonders but know how to appreciate all truth, all beauty, all goodness. And to this wide culture they must join the earnestness, the confidence, the charity and the purity of motive which Christian faith inspires. We need scholars who are saints and saints who are scholars. We need men of genius who live for God and their country; men of action who seek for light in the company of those who know; men of religion who understand that God reveals himself in science, and works in nature, as in the soul of man, for the good of those who know and those who love him.”
While there have been some significant changes in some aspects of our Catholic schools and we are facing some contemporary challenges, the lessons of history, for me, simply re-affirm what has always been and needs to be for the present and future some distinctive characteristics or benchmarks for Catholic schools if they are to be vital instruments of grace for the Church. I briefly point to eight (8) of them today as the focus of my reflection:
Academic excellence, of course, requires that all personnel meet the highest professional standards, curriculum and methodology integrate the highest standards, including technological advances; the program must have high expectations for every student; it must foster continuous improvement, be open to educational assessment and provide transparency to its constituents. For example, in 1990 the Diocese of Pittsburgh was the first diocese in the country to have all its elementary and secondary schools accredited by the Middle States Association.
An article appeared in the July 1858 edition of the Pittsburgh Catholic that could be written today: “Catholic homes must contribute to the training of our children more than our Catholic schools. The children must learn truthfulness, obedience, self denial, cleanliness, politeness, and fear of God, at their own firesides. Schools may finish learning, and by proper discipline avert the corruption of good morals. But they can never supplant the place of home teaching.” Pope John Paul II affirmed this in his 1999 Letter to Families: “Subsidiarity thus complements paternal and maternal love and confirms its fundamental nature, inasmuch as all other participants in the process of education are only able to carry out their responsibilities in the name of the parents, with their consent, and, to a certain degree, with their authorization.” With the breakdown of family structures, both parents working, nearly a 51% divorce rate and other factors, this tenet presents a large challenge for Catholic Schools. How do we re-engage the family as the fundamental cell through which the civilization of truth and love will ultimately pass?
To advocate for parental school choice and personal and corporate tax credits is an important obligation for the Church. We need to help the faithful understand that school choice is not just a policy option or a political question; it is an issue of religious freedom and social justice. In the early 1960’s, Cardinal Wright, then bishop of Pittsburgh, testified at hearings being conducted by the Kennedy administration on this very issue: “A government mindful of the purposes of the Constitution will resist pressures which would destroy educational freedom and parental choice…our government should not use its power to tax or to appropriate tax moneys without first making certain that its action does not deal a mortal blow to the fundamental rights of those taxpayers whose children are in voluntary schools. America will be poor indeed, however rich, if we sap away by taxation the hard earned resources of American families that used to be freely given for that moral and religious education which has played no small part in building up the national common good.”
This goes to the heart of our efforts to provide affordable and accessible Catholic schools for as many of our families as possible, including the poor, many of whom are in urban settings where our schools are facing financial crisis. In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Educational Improvement Tax Credit legislation, passed in 2001 has resulted in nearly $15 million dollars of tuition assistance for students in the Diocese of Pittsburgh alone in six years. Of the 184 approved scholarship organizations in the Commonwealth, the Diocese of Pittsburgh’s Scholastic Opportunity Scholarship program has been the number one recipient of tax credit dollars every year the program has been in existence. We are proud and encouraged by the numerous area businesses that have used the tax credit program to support children and youth who desire to attend Catholic schools.
call her in two weeks when they returned. Are we helping our parents appreciate the real costs involved in Catholic education? Do we not tend to apologize for what we need to charge, many times with tuition not even funding more than 50 percent of the cost? What efforts are we putting forth to help our parents see the intrinsic value of the product? This is the best investment in their child’s future that they could ever possibly hope to make. Nothing comes easily and this notion of sacrifice, the need to set priorities, to forgo luxuries and pleasures for a greater good, is a real challenge for many of our parents today.
By way of conclusion, I refer to the Notre Dame report once again and its concluding reflection: “Perhaps the best way to appreciate the power of Catholic schools is to imagine the Church in the United States without them. What would it look like? Would it be as robust and vital? How would it produce generous leaders? How would it serve immigrants? How would it provide avenues of educational opportunity to the poor, especially those in our cities? The rise of evangelical Christian schools shows that other Christian communities have learned what many Catholics have forgotten or are willing to ignore – that there is no substitute for spending 35 hours each week in an educational environment permeated by faith and Gospel values. To those who wonder how we can afford to make the investment necessary to sustain, strengthen, and expand Catholic schools, we respond by turning the question on its head. How can we afford not to make this investment? Our future depends on it more than we may suspect.”
